The swelling of leeches

Over the course of the lifetime of Green Anarchy, the collective behind it elaborated a intense criticism of “civilisation”, and it is above all the passion that they brought to this task that we wish to celebrate in sharing the article below.

Green Anarchy’s condemnation of “civilisation” and parallel defense of “primitivism” and “wilding” raises unavoidable questions for any serious contemporary anarchism (and beyond).  However, the conceptual framework of its critique is equally open to question.  Are concepts such as “civilisation”, “primitivism” and “wilding” sufficiently clear and robust to serve as the basis for an adequate criticism of contemporary forms of oppression?  Do they not obfuscate as much as they illuminate?  Do they not pass over historical differences in social and political organisation that cannot be ignored for the theory and practice of anti-authoritarian/autonomous anti-capitalism?  And these questions would be just the beginning of any meaningful evaluation.

None of these questions are offered up as refutations or dismissals; they are instead invitations for reflection.

(For earlier and rich reflections on these questions, and more, with a focus on the work of John Zerzan, see the series of the entries under John Zerzan and primitivism in the Anarchist Library, as well as the site johnzerzan.net).

Continue reading

Posted in Commentary | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Between means and ends, between reflection and vision

(Charles Burchfield, The Builders (House Wreckers in June), 1931)

 

If the idea of “Revolution” is to retain any meaning, it needs to be situational in orientation, rooted in the personal desires for liberation, and also be relating to the context in which it resides. It is a living and breathing phenomenon and it is never complete. In general, it is good to avoid flattening situations, or standardizing responses. Flexibility is the key to avoiding stagnation of ideas and activities. Whether ideological or physical, it is important to think outside of our (or their) boxes, however radical we think our ideas are; it is the only way we may grow. Yes, there are times to draw lines, to place limitations or borders around things, but these should be temporary and consensual black and white directions and activities in a larger sea of gray. The gray line is what holds us together, and at the same time, respects individuality and the moment.

 

A reflection on means and ends, theory and practice, by A. Morefus, from Green Anarchy and the Anarchist Library

Continue reading

Posted in Commentary | Tagged , | Leave a comment

To destroy the urban

 

While the world of commodities is in liquidation, threatened by the implosion of all human contact and by ecological catastrophe, while young people slaughter each other and adults muddle through on psycho-pharmaceuticals, exactly what is at stake becomes clearer: subverting social relationships means creating new spaces for life and vice versa. In this sense, a “vast operation of urgent demolition” awaits us.

 

What remains of the “right to the city” (Henri Lefebvre) when all use value is submerged under exchange relations, when the generalised commodification of social relations colonises all urban space, when the conditions necessary for the reproduction of such relations governs all city life and politics?

What remains of “public space” when cities are saturated with technologies of surveillance and control, when behaviour is mapped by systems of “social credit“, when all obstacles to the “free” circulation of “goods” are pushed aside, prohibited, repressed?

What remains  of the freedom of “city air” (Stadtluft macht frei) when the city is reduced to a multiple object of profit extraction and consumption?

To speak of destroying the urban is not a call for physical destruction (capitalists already do this daily), but for a wilding of the city, for the transgression of the norms and borders which divide the urban space into controllable, separate domains of activity, for an occupation that transforms all spaces into thresholds for endless creations and uses.

From Green Anarchy (via the Anarchist Library), “Thoughts on the city” …

Continue reading

Posted in Commentary | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

To destroy work

Continuing a reflection that began with our last post on David Graeber’s criticism of “bullshit jobs” (and with an earlier series of articles posted under the collective title “Against labour, against capital“), we share below an article that was originally published in Green Anarchy (Spring 2013) by Jeffery Shantz, entitled “Reflections on the end of work”, and which was also more recently posted on the Anarchist Library.

(The Anarchist Library has taken the initiative of publishing a series of articles from the old magazine Green Anarchy (2001-2008).  A full archive of the magazine can be found here).

Continue reading

Posted in Commentary | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Looking back at “On the Phenomenon of Bullshit Jobs”: David Graeber

… written down, shit does not smell

Roland Barth, “L’arbre du crime”

 

What constitutes a “bullshit” job?  David Graeber in a now famous essay, “On the Phenonmenon of Bullshit Jobs“(2013), which now finds a second life in book form, has argued that contemporary capitalism generates endless quantities of useless, unproductive work as a means of controlling workers who, having been made technologically redundant, constitute a menace to the reigning social order.

A difficulty however shadows the argument. In the original essay, it rests upon a distinction between “real jobs”, “productive jobs”, jobs that are subjectively “meaningful” to those engaged in them and that objectively benefit “other people”. These are jobs in which workers are “actually making, moving, fixing and maintaining things”. They include nurses, garbage collectors, mechanics, auto workers, tube workers in London, teachers, in sum, jobs that we cannot do without. By contrast, “bullshit” jobs are largely administrative and subsidiary service sectors, and include everything from all-night pizza deliverymen to corporate lawyers.

Continue reading

Posted in Commentary | Tagged | 1 Comment

The anarchy of beauty: Annie Le Brun

 

There is no very evident use in beauty; the necessity of it for cultural purposes is not apparent, and yet civilization could not do without it. The science of aesthetics investigates the conditions in which things are regarded as beautiful; it can give no explanation of the nature or origin of beauty: as usual, its lack of results is concealed under a flood of resounding and meaningless words.

Sigmund Freud, Civilisation and its Discontents

 

beauty is a defiance of authority

William Carlos Williams, Paterson

 

La beauté sera CONVULSIVE ou ne sera pas.

André Breton, Nadja

 

Le silence des choses est celui d’une poudrière qui n’attend que sa mise à feu.

Annie Le Brun, De l’Éperdu

 

Seule la révolte est garante de la cohérence passionnelle que chacun est aujourd’hui sommé d’abandonner pour faire allégeance à ce monde de la servitude volontaire.

Annie Le Brun, Interview: Philosophie magazine (29/01/2009)

 

Annie Le Brun, poet and essayist, remains forever dissonant and dissident; an author and a person who refuses to accept and adapt to the violent reign of commodity fetishism, against which she hurls the rage and passion of gestures of poetry, dreams, desires, love and beauty.

We share below, almost as a long overdue tribute to her work, a recent text which serves as an introduction to her last essay, Ce qui n’a pas de prix. Beauté, laideur et politique.

What follows is a translation from the french language edition of Le monde diplomatique.

Continue reading

Posted in Commentary | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

The rebel as passer-smuggler: A footballers’ lesson

pasador, ra
1. adj. Que pasa de una parte a otra.
2. adj.Dicho de una persona: Que pasa contrabando de un país a otro.

Playing with the polysemy of the spanish word “pasador”, Amador Fernández-Savater offers us the picture of the rebel as a point of passage, analogous to the gesture of a footballer whose principal task is to receive-pass the ball, in a constant gesture of creation, or of the smuggler, who in carrying others/other things across borders, makes life possible beyond borders.

Continue reading

Posted in Commentary | Tagged | Leave a comment

Love and revolution: A film by Yannis Youlountas

We share below Yannis Youlountas’ most recent documentary film-testimony of struggles for autonomy in greece.  In letting those who are directly engaged in these struggles speak for themselves, his work offers a glimpse of what served as a title for an earlier film: “I struggle therefore I am”.

(The version of the film currently available online is provided with french subtitles.  We await an english subtitled version).

We also add below a two part interview with Yannis Youlountas with Alternative Libertaire of france (also in french).

Continue reading

Posted in Film | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Nicaragua: A rebellion at a crossroads

The Crimethinc collective continues to provide a precious window on events in nicaragua, for english speakers.  We share below there latest article-report on the nicaraguan rebellion …

Continue reading

Posted in Commentary, News blog | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Terror’s Atomization of Man: Leo Löwenthal

Horror and fears contain us in a world that we do not want, and impede us from acceding to interruptive encounters that regenerate our existence.  To participate in the exercise of clearing obstructions means first to not offer up our fear to those who produce and administer the horror – they do not merit our fear.  Then, it is useful to map the sites where the impossible can come to meet us, to trace the geopolitical and the geopsychic map of the impossible.  Lastly, let us imagine collectively situations in which we could say “The wonder!  The wonder!”, as if these were our first words.

Frédéric Neyrat, Échapper à l’horreur

An illusion may haunt anti-fascism, the belief that fascism is a distinctive form of political organisation mobilised to attack “liberal democracy”.

The illusion is sustained by the false assumption that modern “democracy” and fascism are qualitatively distinct regimes of power, when they are but modulations of one and the same type of power; a power with plural, overlapping and mutually-sustaining centres, that discipline and mould subjectivities, manage life and apportion death.

Leo Löwenthal, a perhaps lesser known figure of the Frankfurt School, engages with the issue directly in an excellent 1946 essay entitled “Terror’s Atomization of Man”.  As one reads the essay, passing through the analysis of the destruction of the “individual” to its social consequences, it is impossible not to read from it insights into our present, to then be taken to the essay’s central thesis, the horror that Löwenthal called “Terror”:

Mankind today has so tremendously improved its technology as to render itself largely superfluous. Modern machinery and methods of organization have made it possible for a relatively small minority of managers, technicians and skilled workers to keep the whole industrial apparatus going. Society has reached the stage of potential mass unemployment; and mass employment is increasingly a manipulated product of the state and state-like powers which channelize surplus mankind into public works, including armies and official or semi-official political organizations, in order to keep it at once alive and under control.

This is to say that large masses of workers have lost all creative relation to the productive process. They live in a social and economic vacuum. Their dilemma is the pre-condition of terror. It provides the totalitarian forces with a road to power and an object for its exercise. For them, terror is the institutionalized administration of large strata of mankind as surplus.*

Continue reading

Posted in Commentary | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment