The 90th anniversary of the spanish revolution, today

Manel Aisa Pàmpols, Redes Libertarias, 20/07/2026

Trying to understand the anarchist movement in Barcelona, Catalonia, and the surrounding area in the early 20th century is by no means easy, but ultimately it is a phenomenon that is by no means new – it is a class struggle in the truest sense, which emerged, as in so many other parts of Europe and the Americas, with the development of the Industrial Revolution, when the bourgeoisie required a large workforce in the cities or in the industrial regions, and steam-powered machinery began to drive mass production; and so, faced with the need for a large workforce, the great migrations of the modern world began.

Continue reading
Posted in Commentary | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Giorgio Agamben: The first friend and the first enemy

Jacopo Pontormo, Portrait of two friends, c. 1522

As a scientist friend of mine, who likes to reflect on such matters, writes to me, the fundamental event in the history of living beings was the emergence of a microorganism capable of feeling pain. This thesis must, of course, be clarified by placing “pleasure” before — or adding it to — “pain”. If we rate this fundamental capacity of living beings to what Aristotle writes about the perception of the sensation of existence (“to perceive that one lives is a thing pleasant in itself, life being a thing naturally good, and the perceiving of the presence in ourselves of things naturally good being pleasant”), we can then say that the primordial form of the capacity to feel pleasure or pain relates to the very fact of existing, to the sensation of being alive. The sensation of the sweetness of living is, in fact, matched by its symmetrically opposite counterpart, in which, for some reason—or even for no apparent reason at all—feeling that one is alive proves painful.

Continue reading
Posted in Commentary | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

A new hunting season has been declared

Trump and Rubio convene international summit against “anarchists, antifa and the far-left”

Osservatorio repressione, July 10, 2026

Washington convenes sixty countries to coordinate the fight against alleged far-left terrorism. Amid political trials, blacklists, and new anti-terrorism strategies, the Trump administration attempts to internationalise and criminalise dissent.

Continue reading
Posted in Commentary, News blog | Tagged | Leave a comment

Genoa G8 remembered

From Freedom News (18/07/2026) and the CrimethInc. collective (20/07/2026)


Genoa G8 remembered

25 years since I was almost killed in the Diaz School raid, I am returning to the city as the Mayor’s guest of honour

Mark Covell, Freedom News, 18/07/2026

Starting this weekend, the city of Genoa marks the 25th anniversary of the 2001 G8 protests. It is estimated that at least 20,000 Italians will attend a series of events, demos and conferences commemorating the momentous protests, the killing of Carlo Giuliani, the raid on the Diaz School, and the torture at Bolzaneto police barracks.

Continue reading
Posted in Commentary, News blog | Tagged , | Leave a comment

In solidarity with lundimatin

Since December 2014, we have followed, listened – through lundisoir – and learned from the remarkable effort of the lundimatin collective. An essentially french language website, we have over the years sought to translate, comment on – as much as has been possible for us and imperfectly – and share essays, poems and interviews published on the site with the larger english speaking world; not because we think this latter more important, but because we understand that english has come to occupy the place of a global lingua franca.

Today, the lundimatin collective is in difficulty. And because of what they have shared with us, we wish to modestly reciprocate by publishing their call for assistence in English.

Continue reading
Posted in News blog | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Tomás Ibáñez: Anarchisms at the crossroads

Redes Libertarias (06/06/2026)


Tomás Ibáñez’s essay, “Anarchism at the crossroads”, is an intervention in a debate in the Spanish anarchist milieu, but the controversy is neither uniquely Spanish nor novel.

What kind of organisation does anarchist politics call for? Must it have strategic or tactical goals, or both? How is it to be structured “internally”? What relationships should it have, if any, with other political organisations that share common ambitions, with people who have no organisational affiliation? Should the organisation in some way prefigure the “goals” of anarchism? Should such an organisation be bound to a particular “vision” of anarchism, should it heed to a binding ideology? Is a single anarchist organisation even desirable?

The questions, explicit and tacit, raised in the debate Ibáñez addresses are at the very heart of anarchism (and we could add, of the “socialist” tradition more broadly), and while he may not close it – he does not pretend to -, his intervention is important, perhaps even in ways that he has not expressed.

On this matter, we make our own the words of Herman Melville.

Oh, grassy glades! oh, ever vernal endless landscapes in the soul; in ye,—though long parched by the dead drought of the earthy life,—in ye, men yet may roll, like young horses in new morning clover; and for some few fleeting moments, feel the cool dew of the life immortal on them. Would to God these blessed calms would last. But the mingled, mingling threads of life are woven by warp and woof: calms crossed by storms, a storm for every calm. There is no steady unretracing progress in this life; we do not advance through fixed gradations, and at the last one pause:—through infancy’s unconscious spell, boyhood’s thoughtless faith, adolescence’ doubt (the common doom), then scepticism, then disbelief, resting at last in manhood’s pondering repose of If. But once gone through, we trace the round again; and are infants, boys, and men, and Ifs eternally. Where lies the final harbor, whence we unmoor no more? In what rapt ether sails the world, of which the weariest will never weary? Where is the foundling’s father hidden? Our souls are like those orphans whose unwedded mothers die in bearing them: the secret of our paternity lies in their grave, and we must there to learn it.

Moby Dick, 1851

Or in a language closer to “the movement”:

There is no, nor can there be, a theoretical “magic wand” that solves all the problems of current practice. There are no “scripts” of the movement that offer certainty, nor has there ever been a “science of workers’ organisation,” despite the fact that some have tried to elevate themselves as its high priests. There are attempts, trials, experiments, situated analyses, and concrete hypotheses.

José Luis Carretero, Transversales, nº 64, 2023

Continue reading
Posted in Commentary | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Confessions of a communard: Meeting the people where they are

From Freedom News (09/07/2026)


Our strategy for 2027 has been about visible grassroots initiatives which announce our presence

Wren Albion

At the end of 2026 A Commune in the North (ACitN… pronounced “a kitten”) became the focus of a ‘Live Project’, where masters students from the School of Architecture at the University of Sheffield work with charities and community groups. The students helped us to stop worrying about how to get to 150-200 people, and focus on getting to the first 15. They made us think more seriously about our local engagement, which has also made us think more strategically about how we share anarchist principles in the place where we live.

Continue reading
Posted in News blog | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Forms of Attention

by Eli Zaretsky, Sidecar/New Left Review (12/06/2026)


In recent years the concept of attention has garnered considerable – well – attention. It has become, we are told, a commodity within the ‘attention economy’, a limited resource over which advertisers, social media companies, streaming services and the like struggle. Though the idea has become increasingly prominent in the age of the internet and smartphones, our interest can be traced back further. Especially since the 1960s, the hypertrophy of images and screens, taking place against the backdrop of an ever-expanding market, has been eroding, or at least transforming, our collective life – familial and communal relations, the natural and built environment, cultural production and reception. Today we are faced with a further leap in the form of AI. According to a recent article by the New York Times’s Ross Douthat, this heralds ‘an age of extinction’.

Continue reading
Posted in Commentary | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Giorgio Agamben: A way out

Often, in the widespread awareness that we are living through the end of a culture, arises the demand—or the hope—for a new beginning, that is, that after the collapse of a long tradition, a new and more vibrant one will sooner or later come into being. Against this naive expectation, it is worth remembering that we do not need a new beginning, but a way out. Even assuming that a new beginning were possible, everything would then start anew as before, perhaps with different ideas and projects, but always within the framework of a historical epoch and a tradition somehow homogeneous with the previous one. After the collapse of Western history, the last thing we can desire is a new historical epoch; rather, we want to put an end to epochs once and for all, to leave forever and not simply begin again. Leave for what? We cannot say it, but this is good: our silence is more precious than the chatter about the features of an improbable future, which betrays its solidarity with the past by repeating stale formulas like “new or post- or transhumanism.” As the ape in [Franz Kafka’s] “A Report for an Academy”, who has become something radically different, says: “I didn’t want freedom, just a way out.”


Quodlibet, July 6, 2026

Posted in Commentary | Tagged | Leave a comment

Tariq Anwar: Without a future

iNO, No Future, Athens, Greece,  January 13, 2014

From Ficción de la razón (02/07/2026)


What can a world be that cannot imagine its own future? Far from being mere empty rhetoric, this question touches the very core of our condition. For what has been exhausted is not simply an era or a political paradigm, but the very capacity to project the future as a horizon of meaning. The devastation of the planet, the explosion of war and genocide, have placed our generation in an unprecedented position: that of passively awaiting a destruction that promises no redemption. And it is here that reflection must pause, not to lament, but to interrogate the structural feature of this suspension. The Latin word futurum originally designated what is to come, the future participle of esse with the nuance of a reality not yet present but charged with necessity. However, the Roman futurum does not coincide with the Christian expectatio nor with the avenir of secularized modernity. What has died in our time is not the future as such, but a particular way of relating to becoming: the one that, from messianic eschatology to enlightened progress, articulated waiting as a striving toward fulfilment. Today, on the contrary, we live under the domination of a time that no longer opens up, but rather prolongs itself in the mere persistence of what exists.

Continue reading
Posted in Commentary | Tagged , , | Leave a comment