The Day the Émigrés Struck Back

From the CrimethInc. collective (05/02/2025)


Remembering the General Strike of May Day 2006

In 2006, students around the United States engaged in spontaneous walkouts protesting the repression of undocumented people, culminating on May Day in the first great general strike to take place in the US in the 21st century. Today, as students are once again staging walkouts and people around the country are taking to the streets against the immigration policies of the second Trump administration, it is a good time to revisit this earlier high point of resistance.

Continue reading
Posted in Commentary | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Parrhesia: To speak freely, with courage, to the tyrant

Nikolay Nikolayevich Ge, “What is Truth?” Christ and Pilate, 1890

From Michel Foucault and Right Rev Mariann Edgar Budde: The courage to speak the truth to power.


To begin with, what is the general meaning of the word parrhesia? Etymologically, parrhesiazesthai means “to say everything” – from pan … (everything) and rhema … (that which is said). The one who uses parrhesia, the parrhesiastes, is someone who says everything he has in mind: he does not hide anything, but opens his heart and mind completely to other people through his discourse. In parrhesia, the speaker is supposed to give a complete and exact account of what he has in mind so that the audience is able to comprehend exactly what the speaker thinks. The word parrhesia, then, refers to a type of relationship between the speaker and what he says. For in parrhesia, the speaker makes it manifestly clear and obvious that what he says is his own opinion. And he does this by avoiding any kind of rhetorical form which would veil what he thinks. Instead, the parrhesiastes uses the most direct words and forms of expression he can find. Whereas rhetoric provides the speaker with technical devices to help him prevail upon the minds of his audience (regardless of the rhetorician’s own opinion concerning what he says), in parrhesia, the parrheriastes acts on other people’s minds by showing them as directly as possible what he actually believes.

Continue reading
Posted in Commentary | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Giorgio Agamben: Good and Evil

William Blake, The Good and Evil Angels, 1795–?c.1805

The old doctrine that evil is merely the deprivation of the good, and therefore does not exist in itself, needs to be corrected and supplemented in the sense that it is not so much the deprivation as the perversion of the good (with the codicil, formulated by Ivan Illich, corruptio optimi pexima, “there is nothing worse than a corrupt good”). The ontological link with the good thus remains, but the question remains of how and in what sense a good can be perverted and corrupted. If evil is a perverted good, if we can still recognise in it a corrupted and distorted figure of the good, how can we combat it when we are confronted with it today in every area of human life?

Continue reading
Posted in Commentary | Tagged | Leave a comment

A prison letter from Rosa Luxemburg to Sophie Liebknecht; A letter to our present

Rosa Luxemburg: Letters to Sophie Liebknecht


Breslau, Mid December, 1917

Karl has been in Luckau prison for a year now. I have been thinking of that so often this month and of how it is just a year since you came to see me at Wronke, and gave me that lovely Christmas tree. This time I arranged to get one here, but they have brought me such a shabby little tree, with some of its branches broken off, – there’s no comparison between it and yours. I’m sure I don’t know how I shall manage to fix all the eight candles that I have got for it. This is my third Christmas under lock and key, but you needn’t take it to heart. I am as tranquil and cheerful as ever. Last night I lay awake for a long time. I have to go to bed at ten, but can never get to sleep before one in the morning, so I lie in the dark, pondering many things. Last night my thoughts ran thiswise: “How strange it is that I am always in a sort of joyful intoxication, though without sufficient cause. Here I am lying in a dark cell upon a mattress hard as stone; the building has its usual churchyard quiet, so that one might as well be already entombed; through the window there falls across the bed a glint of light from the lamp which burns all night in front of the prison. At intervals I can hear faintly in the distance the noise of a passing train or close at hand the dry cough of the prison guard as in his heavy boots, he takes a few slow strides to stretch his limbs. The gride of the gravel beneath his feet has so hopeless a sound that all the weariness and futility of existence seems to be radiated thereby into the damp and gloomy night. I lie here alone and in silence, enveloped in the manifold black wrappings of darkness, tedium, unfreedom, and winter – and yet my heart beats with an immeasurable and incomprehensible inner joy, just as if I were moving in the brilliant sunshine across a flowery mead. And in the darkness I smile at life, as if I were the possessor of charm which would enable me to transform all that is evil and tragical into serenity and happiness. But when I search my mind for the cause of this joy, I find there is no cause, and can only laugh at myself.” – I believe that the key to the riddle is simply life itself, this deep darkness of night is soft and beautiful as velvet, if only one looks at it in the right way. The gride of the damp gravel beneath the slow and heavy tread of the prison guard is likewise a lovely little song of life – for one who has ears to hear. At such moments I think of you, and would that I could hand over this magic key to you also. Then, at all times and in all places, you would be able to see the beauty, and the joy of life; then you also could live in the sweet intoxication, and make your way across a flowery mead. Do not think that I am offering you imaginary joys, or that I am preaching asceticism. I want you to taste all the real pleasures of the senses. My one desire is to give you in addition my inexhaustible sense of inward bliss. Could I do so, I should be at ease about you, knowing that in your passage through life you were clad in a star-bespangled cloak which would protect you from everything petty, trivial, or harassing.

Continue reading
Posted in Commentary | Tagged | 1 Comment

Report from Los Angeles as Mutual Aid Hubs Mobilize in the Face of Historic Wildfires

Arcadia, CA – January 11: Thousands of people are able to pick up clothes, foods, toiletries during a wild fire relief for victims pop up of Eaton Fire at Santa Anita Park in Arcadia on Saturday, January 11, 2025. (Photo by Keith Birmingham/MediaNews Group/Pasadena Star-News via Getty Images)

From It’s Going Down (15/01/2025)


Grassroots journalist Alissa Azar reports on the unfolding ecological disaster in Los Angeles and how mutual aid groups are mobilizing in response.

On Tuesday, January 7th, people in Los Angeles County, California began receiving a high wind advisory and risk of fire notice. Come nightfall, heavy winds were underway and several fires had broken out, engulfing the city of LA in the worst disaster the city’s history. The fires became so intense that the freeways were lined up with abandoned cars stretched out for miles after people left their vehicles to flee. The city ordered mass evacuations, and thousands of Californians were displaced from their homes within hours.

Almost immediately, hundreds of individuals began to coordinate a massive city-wide mutual aid effort. People began circulating evacuation information, gathering food, water, toiletries, personal protection equipment, medications, bedding, and other essentials. The mutual aid networks stepping forward during this crisis include medics and therapists offering medical assistance and mental health care to people displaced by the fires. Individual community members have also been taking similar initiatives to support their communities. On Friday January 10th, a local man from Altadena set up an impromptu supply distribution center at a closed gas station, which he kept open despite implementation of a curfew and the deployment of the National Guard.

Continue reading
Posted in News blog | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Good Night, Tech-Right: Pull the Plug on AI Fascism

From It’s Going Down (26/01/2025)


On January 20th, at a ceremony attended by both far-Right and neo-fascist leaders from around the globe and some of the richest tech billionaires in the world, including the heads of Apple, Google, Facebook, TikTok, Twitter, and Amazon, Donald Trump took power for the second time. In exchange for tech elites financially backing his campaign and inauguration, Trump has already announced massive new investments in tech infrastructure, focused primarily around Artificial Intelligence (AI) and has pushed to expand into cryptocurrenies.

Continue reading
Posted in Commentary, News blog | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Belarus: No options to choose from

Two texts, from Pramen (26/01/2025)


This Sunday, January 26, Lukashenko will appoint himself president of the Republic of Belarus for the seventh time. The only unknown in this whole story is how many percent of the so-called public support will be drawn for the dictator this time. Taking into account the need to create an image of a stable dictatorship, both the turnout and the number of votes for Lukashenko are likely to break records. And although hatred of the regime continues to remain high, we should not expect serious protests at this stage. Most of those who remain in the country are waiting for the better time to rise, and outside the country the diaspora has spent a great deal of effort supporting resistance to the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

Continue reading
Posted in Commentary, News blog | Leave a comment

Will the real Proudhon please stand up?

From Freedom News (20/01/2025).


Instead of anarchist lore, we need historical context and an open mind

Shawn P Wilbur  

It’s challenging to think about Pierre-Joseph Proudhon today: like it or not, we struggle with him in his role as a progenitor, precursor, pioneer, as the first to say “Je suis anarchiste”, under circumstances where that declaration simply could not mean what it has meant to subsequent anarchists. We recognize him as the author of the phrase “property is theft,” which we are happy to repeat with or without understanding his specific anti-capitalist critique. We linger (with good reason) on his shortcomings: his public anti-feminism, his private bursts of anti-semitism, perhaps his positions on the strike. We question whether his mutualism was radical enough to achieve anarchy. We are also often told that Proudhon changed his mind about some fundamental things later in life, like property and maybe even anarchy. And when all of the pieces don’t seem to fit together, we settle on him being a “man of paradox”.

Continue reading
Posted in Commentary | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Giorgio Agamben: Conjuncture and revolution

Andreas Cellarius, Harmonia Macrocosmica, 1660

Conjuncture and revolution

It is a fact on which we should never tire of reflecting that one of the key terms in our political vocabulary – “revolution” – has been taken from astronomy, where it designates the movement of a planet as it travels through its orbit. But another term which, in the general tendency to replace political categories with economic categories that characterises our time, has also replaced revolution, comes from the astronomical lexicon. We refer to the term “conjuncture”, to which Davide Stimilli has paid special attention in an exemplary study.

This term, which denotes “the phase of the economic cycle that economic activity goes through in a given period of short duration”, is in fact a modification of the term “conjunction”, which means the coincidence of the position of several heavenly bodies at a given time.

Stimilli quotes the passage from Warburg’s essay, La divinazione antica pagana in testi e immagini dell’età di Lutero, where conjunction and revolution are juxtaposed: “Only within vast periods of time, called revolutions, could such conjunctions be expected. In a carefully conceived system, great and maximal conjunctions were distinguished; the latter were the most dangerous, resulting from the meeting of the higher planets Saturn, Jupiter and Mars. The more conjunctions coincided, the more frightening the situation seemed to be, although the planet with the most favourable character could influence the worst.” And it is significant that it was precisely a revolutionary like Auguste Blanqui, disappointed in his expectations, who at the end of his life came to conceive the history of mankind as something which, like the movement of the stars, repeats itself infinitely and eternally stages the same representations.

What is happening before our eyes today is exactly such a phenomenon, in which an economic conjuncture, by its very nature contingent and arbitrary, tries to impose its terrifying domination over the whole of social life. The link between politics and the stars must therefore be completely abandoned, and the tie that seeks to intertwine astronomical destiny and revolution, necessity and economic conjuncture, natural science and politics, must be severed in all areas. Politics is inscribed neither in the celestial spheres nor in the laws of economics: it is in our weak hands and in the lucidity with which we refute all pretensions to imprison it in conjunctures and revolutions.


Source: Giorgio Agamben, “Congiuntura e rivoluzione”, Quodlibet, 15/01/2025

Posted in Commentary | Tagged | Leave a comment

Giorgio Agamben: The number of the murdered

Douce Apocalypse, Anonymous, England

The number of the murdered

It is necessary to meditate again and again on the passage in Revelation (6:9-11) where we read: “When he opened the fifth seal, I saw under the altar the souls of those who had been slain because of the word of God and the testimony they had maintained. They called out in a loud voice, “How long, Sovereign Lord, holy and true, until you judge the inhabitants of the earth and avenge our blood?” Then each of them was given a white robe, and they were told to wait a little longer, until the full number of their fellow servants, their brothers and sisters,[a] were killed just as they had been.”

History will not end and the final judgement will not be pronounced until the number of the righteous slain is completed. Is this perhaps what is happening all around us? And how many more righteous must be slain, as we see them dying every day? No doubt, history is a history of wars, deaths and murders. But the point of the opening of the fifth seal is not that, in the time in which we live, we should wait inertly for the number of the slain to be completed. Even if the newspapers do nothing but count them daily, we do not know what that number is, just as we do not know when the judgement will take place or if it will ever happen. We live in an in-between time and, like those whose throats were slit, we must bear witness to what we see and what we believe. There is no other task for us before the number of the slain is completed.


Source: Giorgio Agamben, “Il numero degli uccisi”, Quodlibet, 07/01/2025

Posted in Commentary | Tagged | Leave a comment