
“We do not struggle as working class, we struggle against being working class … . Our struggle is not the struggle of labour: it is the struggle against labour. …There is nothing good about being members of the working class, about being ordered, commanded, separated from our product and our process of production. Struggle arises not from the fact that we are working class but from the fact that we-are-and-are-not working class, that we exist against-and-beyond being working class …”
John Holloway, Change the World Without Taking Power
The arrival of the coal miners in Madrid on the 10th of July was to be followed on the 11th with a protest march on the Ministry of Industry in the morning and latter in the evening by a solidarity march from Atocha square to Peurta del Sol. What would in fact transpire were police beatings, shootings, arrests of protesters and anyone else who happened to be about (at least a hundred people wounded and hundreds more arrested), all in the name of order, normality.
Continue reading →
Governing for freedom: Werner Bonefeld on the Bourgeois State
Werner Bonefeld’s work on the role of the state in the creation of a liberal economic order, that is, capitalism, is of great value. Often understood as a simple tool of the bourgeoisie, anti-capitalist politics is then conceived of as either aiming to change how the tool is employed or at its’ the appropriation. But should by contrast the state be conceived as an intrinsic part of capitalism (such that it makes sense to speak of a bourgeois state), then it is not a mere tool, but rather that which makes it possible for capitalism to exist. In sum, the state is an active and constant agency that creates the moral and legal conditions for the individual competition for property that defines capitalism. It is the destroyer of the commons and of the proletariat; the alternative to capitalism is thus finally a call for the destruction of private property, wage labour, and the capitalist state.
Continue reading →