Social movements form around problems. We don’t mean this in a simple functionalist fashion, as if there is a pre-existent problem which then produces a social movement that, in turn, forces the state or capital to respond and solve the problem. Rather, social movements produce their own problematic at the same time as they are formed by them. … As we try to formulate the problematic, we create new worlds. This is what we mean by ‘worlding’: by envisaging a different world, by acting in a different world we actually call forth that world. It is only because we have, at least partially, moved out of what makes ‘sense’ in the old world that another world can start to make its own sense.
The Free Association
Some six months ago, a movement of house occupations began in the small town of Sanlúcar de Barrameda (Cádiz). Initially without coordination or exposure, the movement now extends to eight collective occupations of buildings constructed with speculative interest and never inhabited, and home now to some eighty families.
Rebellion/revolution as war
(All art by Bilal Berreni – Zoo Project)
Our movement … is in the first place a negative movement, a movement against identity. It is we who de-compose, we are the wreckers. It is capital which constantly seeks to compose, to create identities, to create stability (always illusory, but essential to its existence), to contain and deny our negativity. We are the source of movement, we are the subject …
John Holloway, Change the World Without Taking Power
Let us think not of class as a fixed social category or identity, as a component part of a social system. For as so conceived, the constituent classes of any given social system are integral to it.
Continue reading →