Anarcho-Feminism: Two Statements

Voices of revolutionary feminism …

The Anarcho-Feminist Manifesto was written by Chicago Anarcho-Feminists. Blood of the Flower was written by Red Rosia and Black Maria of Black Rose Anarcho-Feminists, who in 1971 could be reached c/o The Women’s Centre, 46 Pleasant Street, Cambridge Mass. Both articles first appeared in Siren — A Journal of Anarcho-Feminism Vol 1 No 1 1971 (now defunct), published in Chicago. They were next published together as a pamphlet by the Seattle section of the Social Revolutionary Anarchist Federation and the Revolutionary Anarchist Print Fund, c/o 4736 University Way NE, Seattle, WA 98105. (The Anarchist Library)

Continue reading
Posted in Commentary | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Peggy Kornegger: Anarchism: The Feminist Connection

Destroy capitalism. End patriarchy. Smash heterosexism. All are obviously essential tasks in the building of a new and truly human world. Marxists, other socialists, social anarchists, feminists – all would agree. But what the socialist, and even some feminists, leave out is this: We must smash all forms of domination. That’s not just a slogan, and it is the hardest task of all. It means that we have to see through the spectacle, destroy the stage sets, know that there are other ways of doing things. It means that we have to do more than react in programmed rebellions – we must act. And our actions will be collectively taken, while each person acts autonomously. Does that seem contradictory? It isn’t – but it will be very difficult to do. The individual cannot change anything very much; for that reason, we have to work together. But that work must be without leaders as we know them, and without delegating any control over what we do and what we want to build.

Carol Ehrlich, Socialism, Anarchism, and Feminism

In the wake of our last post, Sabotaging gender, feminism and capital, we thought that it would be useful to share some of the voices of what we wish to call revolutionary feminism. This is not the first time that we do so (click here), nor will it be the last.

We begin with an early and important reflection on the encounter between feminism and anarchism, by Peggy Kornegger.

Continue reading
Posted in Commentary | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Sabotaging gender, feminism and capital

We share below an essay by a friend of Autonomies, a conference paper presented at the CIEG II International Congress: Gender, Feminist and Woman’s Studies: Reflexivity, Resistance and Action (July 24-26), at the ISCSP – Instituto Superior de Ciências Sociais e Políticas, Lisbon.

A contribution to the debate on feminism.

Continue reading
Posted in Commentary | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Élisée Reclus: Why We Are Anarchists

There is morality only in freedom.

Élisée Reclus

We share a text by Élisée Reclus that is perhaps ageless. (From Robert Graham’s Anarchist Weblog).

Continue reading
Posted in Commentary | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Looking back-forward at the gilets jaunes: A taking stock

We share an unfinished debate on the yellow vests’ movement, on what is or was radical within it, and where it failed, if indeed it did so. Our caution here is dictated by the different positions in the exchange below.

We begin with a critical appraisal of the movement from the Temps Critiques collective, followed by a more apologetic note, and in turn a response from the collective.

Without wishing, or being able to close the issue, it can be said that what separates the two sides of this debate is an interpretation or analysis of capitalism. For the Temps Critiques collective, to the extent that the movement fails to contest the conditions of contemporary commodity production, while failing to see the dismantling of the State, the privatisation of daily life in all of its many domains, it is a failed movement. What our apologist, Dietrich Hoss, defends is that the movement has shattered processes of capitalist subjectivisation, which opens up possibilities and potentialities unforseen before its eruption.

It is our conviction that the two views in fact complement each other, but the theoretical work for this union still awaits.

Continue reading
Posted in Commentary | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Jacques Rancière: The singularity of rebellion and autonomy

Démocratie veut dire d’abord cela : un gouvernement anarchique, fondé sur rien d’autre que sur l’absence de tout titre à gouverner.

Jacques Rancière, La haine de la démocratie

To share, the always timely reflections of Jacques Rancière.

A question arises from this interview that is pressing for any anti-capitalist dissident or rebel: what is the relation between autonomy as act or event and its institutionalisation? Can the latter give shape to the former, or must they exist in permanent dissonance? If the following interview provides us with no clear answer, the larger body of Rancière’s work suggests the last. But if this is so, is not Rancière simply reminding us that perfect justice is an impossibility, and that freedom or autonomy resides in the permanent possibility of recreating ourselves, together? And perhaps this is what Rancière finally means by “democracy” as “anarchic government”.

Continue reading
Posted in Commentary | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Beyond violence and non-violence: Peter Gelderloos

… nonviolence, in its current manifestations, is based on falsified histories of struggle. It has implicit and explicit connections to white people’s manipulations of the struggles of people of color. Its methods are wrapped in authoritarian dynamics, and its results are harnessed to meet government objectives over popular objectives. It masks and even encourages patriarchal assumptions and power dynamics. Its strategic options invariably lead to dead ends. And its practitioners delude themselves …

We must realistically accept that revolution is a social war, not because we like war, but because we recognize that the status quo is a low-intensity war and challenging the state results in an intensification of that warfare. We must also accept that revolution necessitates interpersonal conflict because certain classes of people are employed to defend the centralizing institutions we must destroy. People who continue to dehumanize themselves as agents of law and order must be defeated by whatever means necessary until they can no longer prevent people’s autonomous realization of their needs.

Peter Gelderloos, How Nonviolence Protects the State

In what could be described as a sort of “coda” to our last two “film” posts on “violent” anarchist political action, we share a rightfully celebrated and significant essay by Peter Gelderloos on violence and non-violence.

In sum, to confine discussions of tactics and strategy to debates about violence and non-violence is to condemn the former to impotence, because the latter is a false debate, and a dangerously false debate, masquerading as moral rectitude. The issue is one of tactics and strategy, and if these are difficult enough to think through and act upon, they are paralysed by false controversies to which there is no answer, thereby contributing to the perpetuation of what already exists.

If we have disagreements with Gelderloos, they in fact are over the substantive question of tactics and strategy; but as he himself defends, there is no one path of anarchy.

Continue reading
Posted in Commentary | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

G.A.R.I.: Grupos de Acción Revolucionaria Internacionalista

The Grupos de Acción Revolucionaria Internacionalista/Internationalist Revolutionary Action Groups (GARI) were a series of autonomous anti-capitalist groups, largely of anarchist inspiration, which coordinated to carry out armed agitation and propaganda actions after the self-dissolution of the Iberian Liberation Movement (MIL), in Toulouse, because of the detention of its members and the death sentence of one of them, Salvador Puig Antich. After the execution of Puig Antich, the GARI will take actions to avoid a possible death penalty for other members of the MIL such as Oriol Solé Sugranyes and Josep Lluis Pons Llobet, in those moments imprisoned and pending trial. Its acronyms appear for the first time the day after the kidnapping of the director of the Paris branch of the Bank of Bilbao, on May 3, 1974.

Continue reading
Posted in Commentary, Film | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The Great Anarchist Conspiracy

From the Cinema Committee …

We are happy to present our latest work, The Great Anarchist Conspiracy, a documentary that charts anarchism’s resilient survival from the 1890s all the way up the 1970s. The fact that you are reading this, and are most likely an anarchist, is proof that our international movement has survived every attempt to crush it. Against impossible odds, and without wielding state power, the anarchist movement continues to spread across the planet, even as you read this.

Continue reading
Posted in Film | Tagged | Leave a comment

For William Van Spronsen: In memoriam

From the CrimethInc. Collective …

Continue reading
Posted in News blog | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment